This discussion paper puts forward a framework for managing the risks of neighbourhood governance:
There are strong arguments in support of neighbourhoods being given the powers to act on very local issues, to control local liveability services and community assets, and to influence decisions about a much wider range of issues and mainstream services.

Citizen engagement is crucial for improving public services and creating sustainable and effective strategies for civil and civic regeneration, especially at the very local level. However, any move towards more widespread neighbourhood empowerment brings risks, as previous experiments with devolution have proved. Community control over finances, services and assets brings with it the threats of fragmentation, mismanagement of public goods, the politicisation of neighbourhood issues, and the potential for localised power to create or exaggerate community divisions. These risks increase in diverse or deprived neighbourhoods where ethnic, racial or social relationships are already under pressure.

Housing & regeneration Local government & public services

Posted on: 1 August 2010 Authors: Saffron Woodcraft,


The Young Foundation

The UK’s home for community research and social innovation.

Visit The Young Foundation

Peer Research Network

Driving quality and innovation in peer research. 

Visit our network

Institute for Community Studies

A new kind of research body with people at its heart. 

Visit our research institute

© The Young Foundation 2022